Technology

How sharm gets smarter

A large language model reads the world. sharm learns to live in it — remembering, feeling and anticipating, and sharpening on your world with use. Explore what makes it a different kind of intelligence, and the measured signal behind it.

A different category

Not a better chatbot — a different shape of mind

LLMs like Claude and GPT spike on language. sharm is built for the experiential axes an LLM structurally lacks — memory, affect, anticipation, privacy. Hover an axis to see the difference.

LanguageMemoryAffectAnticipationPrivacyPersonalizationOn-device
A stateless LLMsharm

Memory

A stateless LLM

Forgets once the context window scrolls past — recall is retrieval bolted onto frozen weights.

sharm world model

A hippocampal loop stores and replays episodes, so yesterday shapes today.

Illustrative capability profile — what each system is designed for, not a head-to-head benchmark score.

The flywheel

The more of your world it sees, the sharper it gets

Every moment runs one loop — perceive, remember, feel, anticipate — and each pass leaves the model more tuned to your life. A general model is frozen after training. sharm keeps learning.

01

Perceive

See and hear the moment, on-device.

02

Remember

Bind it to episodic memory.

03

Feel

Weigh how much it matters.

04

Anticipate

Project what comes next.

Proof it learns: episodic memory, sharpening

Measured · recall@1

As the memory module trains on grounded data, its ability to recall the right past moment climbs from near-baseline to near- ceiling — on our leak-guarded probe (chance ≈ 1.6%).

0%25%50%75%100%out of boxgroundedfine-tuned
Measured signal

Numbers we can stand behind

Results from our own evaluations — leak-aware, on held-out data. We report the capabilities that matter for a world model: reading affect, recalling the past, recognizing people and products, and learning efficiently.

0.000
Valence correlation
vs distilled human judgment, our held-out affect eval
0.000
Threat correlation
same held-out eval
0.000
Episodic recall@1
leak-guarded memory probe (chance ≈ 0.016)
0.0000
Face recognition AUC
SFace, standard LFW protocol
0.0%
Brand recognition top-1
221-brand curated set, held-out exemplars
0%
Training loss, one run
10-head joint trainer, ~$0.52 of compute

Affect correlation (Pearson r)

Measured

vs distilled human judgment · higher is better

0.80 human agreement
Valencepositive ↔ negative0.000
Threatsafe ↔ danger0.000

Training loss · one $0.52 run

Measured · −37%

10-head joint trainer · H100 · lower is better

0.350.470.600.720.85ep 1525ep 50

Results are from sharm's own evaluations on held-out data. sharm is a world model — a different category from general chat LLMs — so we benchmark the capabilities that matter for living in the moment, not general language tasks. Edge-device timings are simulated until on-silicon evaluation is published.

See it living a moment